<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indra's Drishtikona (Viewpoint)</title>
	<link>http://drishtikona.com</link>
	<description>My online journal with thoughts, opinions, comments and more..</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
        
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Manufacturing and Machining- My Lifeline</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/manufacturing/002562.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/manufacturing/002562.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com/archives/manufacturing/002562.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Hindustan Motors, I started as executive trainee, a new concept of building managers for the future because of the company's close relationship with General Motors, the largest company in the world at that time. After a short over-viewing of various departments of the automobile giant in the country, I started working in machine shop as it was called in those days. I used to convince some easy going workmen and work on the machine tools as regular operator to learn the tricks of the trade. I learnt a lot that Prof (later on Dr.) Chandiramani couldn't have helped. Those were the years when Hindustan Motors were indigenizing the manufacturing of the components and buying the most modern machine tools for the same. I got myself shifted to machine tools tryout department that used to prove the machines for the production engineering aspects and cycle time before handing over to the operation. It was a great learning. Later on I was shifted to the operation, and got the first promotion as 'superintendent' in Axle Plant. The designation soon became more civil with a change as 'Area Manager' and later just 'Manager'. After a visit to Vauxhall Motors, UK, I was shifted to become Area manager of Engine Plant. Transmission came under me only when I got promoted as Manufacturing Manager, Mechanical. Thus all along, I remained close to machining. 

At one time, the President suggested me to take over as the Manager, car assembly. I was forthright to reject his offer on ground of my interest in machining, though car assembly used to have more top management attraction with better prospect for career progress. Another reason of my rejection of the offer was the company politics in the area. I was never good at that.

Much later, as General Manager, Technical Services, I headed the technical aspects of the sheet metal division too that covered sheet-metal stamping, body welding, painting, and vehicle assembly along with the mechanical division that was primarily machining along with many other responsibilities. And the years in the assignment were really exciting as I could learn almost every aspect of manufacturing engineering of an industrial product such as automobile. 

Unlike others in the industry, I was one who remained academic all along the career, and kept on writing what I learnt and experienced. Tata McGraw Hill published my Trouble Shooting Handbook-Machining. Later on I wrote 'A Treatise on Automobile Manufacturing' and 'Latest Trends in Machining' that are available on my website www.drishtikona.com under heading '<a href="http://www.drishtikona.com/writings/" target="_blank">my writings'</a>. Unfortunately, I couldn't place my book on gear manufacturing that became very popular in the industry, 'Mr. Supervisor as Mr. Manager- a guide for supervisors' and my collection of articles written for technical magazines on my website. 

<strong>Though the manufacturing management was my professional assignment I remained passionately attached in knowing the latest in technologies of manufacturing and particularly machining and machine tools. During my interactions with the executives from the machine tools and equipment manufacturers from all over the world, my favourite question used to be, 'What are the latest in technology? How will be the manufacturing some ten years from now?'  Even today, I get a kick if I come to know of something new about <a href="http://drishtikona.com/archives/category/machining/" target="_blank">machining</a> or <a href="http://drishtikona.com/archives/category/manufacturing/" target="_blank">manufacturing</a>.         
</strong>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In Hindustan Motors, I started as executive trainee, a new concept of building managers for the future because of the company's close relationship with General Motors, the largest company in the world at that time. After a short over-viewing of various departments of the automobile giant in the country, I started working in machine shop as it was called in those days. I used to convince some easy going workmen and work on the machine tools as regular operator to learn the tricks of the trade. I learnt a lot that Prof (later on Dr.) Chandiramani couldn't have helped. Those were the years when Hindustan Motors were indigenizing the manufacturing of the components and buying the most modern machine tools for the same. I got myself shifted to machine tools tryout department that used to prove the machines for the production engineering aspects and cycle time before handing over to the operation. It was a great learning. Later on I was shifted to the operation, and got the first promotion as 'superintendent' in Axle Plant. The designation soon became more civil with a change as 'Area Manager' and later just 'Manager'. After a visit to Vauxhall Motors, UK, I was shifted to become Area manager of Engine Plant. Transmission came under me only when I got promoted as Manufacturing Manager, Mechanical. Thus all along, I remained close to machining. 

At one time, the President suggested me to take over as the Manager, car assembly. I was forthright to reject his offer on ground of my interest in machining, though car assembly used to have more top management attraction with better prospect for career progress. Another reason of my rejection of the offer was the company politics in the area. I was never good at that.

Much later, as General Manager, Technical Services, I headed the technical aspects of the sheet metal division too that covered sheet-metal stamping, body welding, painting, and vehicle assembly along with the mechanical division that was primarily machining along with many other responsibilities. And the years in the assignment were really exciting as I could learn almost every aspect of manufacturing engineering of an industrial product such as automobile. 

Unlike others in the industry, I was one who remained academic all along the career, and kept on writing what I learnt and experienced. Tata McGraw Hill published my Trouble Shooting Handbook-Machining. Later on I wrote 'A Treatise on Automobile Manufacturing' and 'Latest Trends in Machining' that are available on my website www.drishtikona.com under heading '<a href="http://www.drishtikona.com/writings/" target="_blank">my writings'</a>. Unfortunately, I couldn't place my book on gear manufacturing that became very popular in the industry, 'Mr. Supervisor as Mr. Manager- a guide for supervisors' and my collection of articles written for technical magazines on my website. 

<strong>Though the manufacturing management was my professional assignment I remained passionately attached in knowing the latest in technologies of manufacturing and particularly machining and machine tools. During my interactions with the executives from the machine tools and equipment manufacturers from all over the world, my favourite question used to be, 'What are the latest in technology? How will be the manufacturing some ten years from now?'  Even today, I get a kick if I come to know of something new about <a href="http://drishtikona.com/archives/category/machining/" target="_blank">machining</a> or <a href="http://drishtikona.com/archives/category/manufacturing/" target="_blank">manufacturing</a>.         
</strong>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/manufacturing/002562.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Machining Industry Can Lead Indian Manufacturing Sector</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/001670.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/001670.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/001670.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. B N Mondal, Head, Centre for Advanced Materials Processing, Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute & Secretary, Investment Casting Society, India had invited me to attend the 'National Workshop regarding super hard material and its cutting (machining) application' at CMERI, Durgapur during 29-30 the March, 2007. As I am not keeping very good health these days, I found traveling to Durgapur a little trivial. But I couldn't resist the temptation to write a brief update on machining industry in India, as I foresee. I did send this to Dr. Mandal, whom I knew from his IIT's days. Rakesh, my eldest son was at that time in IIT, Kharagpur. Here is the writeup that I could do. 

<blockquote><b>Machining Industry Can Lead Indian Manufacturing Sector</b>

Machining has been an important manufacturing process for ages for engineering industry. A large number of parts going in the final assemblies of the products, be it aeroplanes or automobiles require machining operations to finish them within critical tolerances for optimum functioning over the life cycles.  

Over the years, there have been sea changes in all areas of the machining, be its the machine tools, the cutting tools, fixturing, or other accessories such as cooling agents. But some changes are almost universal in all these. Flexibility, reconfigurability, modularity, ease and error free automatic operations, and serviceability have been the main goals.

CNC Machining centers and turning centers have replaced different machine tools for varying machining operations, such as drilling, reaming, boring, and even turning, grinding and even broaching. Even a complicated component such as cylinder blocks of an automobile engine or a sophisticated huge sheet metal stamping die tools can almost be totally machined in a single setup today on one machine. 

Cutting tool materials today can machine harden above 60Rc pieces and that too without any cooling agent that used to cause a lot of nuisance on the shop floor. In next step, perhaps the cutting tools will be smart enough to automatically switch over the cutting parameters depending on the real machining characteristics of the material being machined.   

Workholding fixtures are smarter to control precisely the grip force required for the cutting parameters without deforming the features as it comes out of the machine tools after the finishing operations.

But the most important input has come from the Internet compatible controls that has made troubleshooting and maintenance manageable even for sophisticated items by removing the need of the expert to be physically present to assist on the machine tools.  

Some of new trends that has helped the machining to be more productive are the near net shape basic forming processes for precision casting and forging that have eliminated the need of three step machining to one. Simultaneously, in some sector such as aeroplane industry, the components are getting bulk machined from almost raw billets integrating number of components in one thus eliminating assembling operation and tolerance stack up. The advent of high speed machining and hard machining has also facilitated the production engineers to eliminate number of machining steps.

Surprisingly, no innovation has come in basic machine tool design to replace the machining/turning centers that once was predicted. 

For India, it is necessary that it becomes a manufacturing nation so that huge employment gets created to exploit its demographical advantages to the best. Machining industry can be one area that can serve the purpose. Some may say that it is capital intensive, but with machining center when one machine can be used to finish many components totally, it can be commercially viable business.

I am pained that India even today does not facilities good enough to manufacture all the die tools of the automotive industry, and the OEM manufacturers both domestic and global with presence in India are dependent to get it from other cheaper countries such as Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, or perhaps from China and Thailand. One can appreciate the need by looking at the number of die tools involved in creating a new model of car and its cost. Will the OEMs keep on importing them with frequent changes of models that will be expected from the Indian automotive enthusiasts and consumers?

My other agony relates to the machine tools industry. Unfortunately, with all opportunity not a single machine tools company could grow to a global scale though all the necessary skill and talent with demand too was there. Naturally, an ambience is to be created by the government agencies such as National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) so that more and more of the graduate engineers start thinking of becoming entrepreneurs in manufacturing sector. CMERI can also be a motivating force.
</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dr. B N Mondal, Head, Centre for Advanced Materials Processing, Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute & Secretary, Investment Casting Society, India had invited me to attend the 'National Workshop regarding super hard material and its cutting (machining) application' at CMERI, Durgapur during 29-30 the March, 2007. As I am not keeping very good health these days, I found traveling to Durgapur a little trivial. But I couldn't resist the temptation to write a brief update on machining industry in India, as I foresee. I did send this to Dr. Mandal, whom I knew from his IIT's days. Rakesh, my eldest son was at that time in IIT, Kharagpur. Here is the writeup that I could do. 

<blockquote><b>Machining Industry Can Lead Indian Manufacturing Sector</b>

Machining has been an important manufacturing process for ages for engineering industry. A large number of parts going in the final assemblies of the products, be it aeroplanes or automobiles require machining operations to finish them within critical tolerances for optimum functioning over the life cycles.  

Over the years, there have been sea changes in all areas of the machining, be its the machine tools, the cutting tools, fixturing, or other accessories such as cooling agents. But some changes are almost universal in all these. Flexibility, reconfigurability, modularity, ease and error free automatic operations, and serviceability have been the main goals.

CNC Machining centers and turning centers have replaced different machine tools for varying machining operations, such as drilling, reaming, boring, and even turning, grinding and even broaching. Even a complicated component such as cylinder blocks of an automobile engine or a sophisticated huge sheet metal stamping die tools can almost be totally machined in a single setup today on one machine. 

Cutting tool materials today can machine harden above 60Rc pieces and that too without any cooling agent that used to cause a lot of nuisance on the shop floor. In next step, perhaps the cutting tools will be smart enough to automatically switch over the cutting parameters depending on the real machining characteristics of the material being machined.   

Workholding fixtures are smarter to control precisely the grip force required for the cutting parameters without deforming the features as it comes out of the machine tools after the finishing operations.

But the most important input has come from the Internet compatible controls that has made troubleshooting and maintenance manageable even for sophisticated items by removing the need of the expert to be physically present to assist on the machine tools.  

Some of new trends that has helped the machining to be more productive are the near net shape basic forming processes for precision casting and forging that have eliminated the need of three step machining to one. Simultaneously, in some sector such as aeroplane industry, the components are getting bulk machined from almost raw billets integrating number of components in one thus eliminating assembling operation and tolerance stack up. The advent of high speed machining and hard machining has also facilitated the production engineers to eliminate number of machining steps.

Surprisingly, no innovation has come in basic machine tool design to replace the machining/turning centers that once was predicted. 

For India, it is necessary that it becomes a manufacturing nation so that huge employment gets created to exploit its demographical advantages to the best. Machining industry can be one area that can serve the purpose. Some may say that it is capital intensive, but with machining center when one machine can be used to finish many components totally, it can be commercially viable business.

I am pained that India even today does not facilities good enough to manufacture all the die tools of the automotive industry, and the OEM manufacturers both domestic and global with presence in India are dependent to get it from other cheaper countries such as Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, or perhaps from China and Thailand. One can appreciate the need by looking at the number of die tools involved in creating a new model of car and its cost. Will the OEMs keep on importing them with frequent changes of models that will be expected from the Indian automotive enthusiasts and consumers?

My other agony relates to the machine tools industry. Unfortunately, with all opportunity not a single machine tools company could grow to a global scale though all the necessary skill and talent with demand too was there. Naturally, an ambience is to be created by the government agencies such as National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) so that more and more of the graduate engineers start thinking of becoming entrepreneurs in manufacturing sector. CMERI can also be a motivating force.
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/001670.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Axis Machining</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000542.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000542.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com:90/archives/uncategorized/000542.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Machining with five-axis equipment can offer manufacturers many advantages- improved productivity, higher machining accuracy, reduced in-process inventory, and improved operator and machine usage. For certain applications, particularly in aerospace, automotive and die/mold applications can realize substantial payoffs from five-axis machining, especially as costs for the latest five-axis gear have declined.

Aerospace application of five axis machine is preferred due to the basic design of highly contoured aircraft components. There are very few, if any, parts in aircraft structures that have straight lines on them. Modern fighters and bombers, are getting stealthier. That gets translated into more contour, more curvature than ever before, and so they require to be machined on five-axis equipment. Standardized tooling saves money and lead time for manufacturers. The trend is toward monolithic structures in aerospace design.. In earlier time, multiple sheet-metal components that were manufactured and then fastened together mechanically, which demanded a lot of additional assembly tooling and assembly labor. When other options are not allowed based on the geometry, the option left is full five axis. And the only industry where we've seen that happen at the moment is in the aerospace industry, like with blisk work, which is a combination of blade and disk. Five-axis configurations vary widely depending on the application, but the most common one is with both rotary axes are on the spindle. 

Programming complexity, aside from high cost, has posed the biggest barriers to widespread adoption of five-axis machinery. Five-axis machines continue to get faster and more accurate, so it's a technology that's emerging. It has its applications, but it is certainly not a mature, fully functional technology yet. CAM systems are still very weak. The learning curve for a CAD/CAM operator to become very good with five-axis is a challenge for small shops. Very few CAM systems can give you good data for full five-axis machining. 

Die/mold can take advantage of three-axis or 3+2. Among the European builders, there's a huge push in the five-axis machining centers for die/mold. Benefits to the five-axis approach, in terms of being able to hit multiple sides of the parts and being able to shorten the tool length on side walls, are considerable. CAM software and the sheer cost of five-axis machine tools are now less of an issue than in recent years In Europe, manufacturers readily accepted five-axis machining as a way to help compete with lower-cost labor centers in Asia and also in Eastern Europe. Because labor's so cheap in other markets, companies that want to remain competitive have to start machining smarter, which doesn't mean just machining faster or working longer hours. It means looking really closely at your current processes, focusing on your application, and investing in new technology, training, correct tooling, and a host of other factors to cut down lead times, so we can remain competitive. However, these machines aren't cheap. It's all right if you're a large manufacturer, but for a tooling company that is thinking of investing in this technology, it's a big money. For smaller tool-and-die shops, five-axis equipment ranging from $100,000 to $1 million is a major investment, but over the last few years these machines are more affordable for these smaller shops. 

Smaller shops are now seeing advantages to using five-axis and 3+2 technology. In the tool-and-die industry, 90% of the jobs can be machined extremely efficiently using 3+2 technology,  because it provides greater flexibility to cut the part, reduce tool length, improve surface finish, and one can still employ high-speed, high-efficiency machining techniques.
The progression has gone from three to 3+2-axis machining, where tool length can be shortened and machine can be run at high speeds as well. With simultaneous five-axis, all axes move at the same time 
Programming for simultaneous five-axis machining is complex Programming for five-axis requires much more consideration than for 3+2 machining. Part geometry, workpiece orientation, and entry and exit conditions are extremely important. Good collision detection is absolutely essential. One must be surely know what's happening and that the head of the machine isn't colliding with the part, clamps, or fixturing. <b>Many CAM software packages claim provision for 'gouge-free' toolpaths which are verified against the tool and the holder but not for the machine itself, which is essential for five-axis programming.
</b>
High-speed machining also plays a key role in manufacturers deploying five-axis systems to speed up their manufacturing processes. To apply five-axis machining techniques effectively, users need to find the proper solutions for their particular application. Users should seek out credible experts in five-axis machining. It can be quite confusing to new users entering this field, which can lead to discouragement and a loss of return on the investment. Speed, accuracy, and flexibility combined with manufacturing knowledge and experience can help users find the right tools for their needs. With five-axis machines, in the past the limiting factor was the speed of the rotary tables, but today's five-axis machines possess faster rotary tables.
However, five-axis machining is a smaller market.<b> Some manufacturers have sold well into high-production machining applications, particularly into engine manufacturing, </b>where five-axis equipment helps reduce setups. By reducing setups, it cuts down on work in process. The machines are doing well with jet engine components, prismatic parts, and engine components in automotive. Fast, single setups often make five-axis machining more efficient than three-axis equipment. Customers can mill, drill, tap, and saw parts to length in one setup, eliminating the need for any other machine or material handling system 

<b>Five axis machining provides the concept of one machine factory. Though the investment is high, but there is always a need of special complex parts manufacturing and that ensuring the best quality. Five axis machines are the answer.  

</b>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Machining with five-axis equipment can offer manufacturers many advantages- improved productivity, higher machining accuracy, reduced in-process inventory, and improved operator and machine usage. For certain applications, particularly in aerospace, automotive and die/mold applications can realize substantial payoffs from five-axis machining, especially as costs for the latest five-axis gear have declined.

Aerospace application of five axis machine is preferred due to the basic design of highly contoured aircraft components. There are very few, if any, parts in aircraft structures that have straight lines on them. Modern fighters and bombers, are getting stealthier. That gets translated into more contour, more curvature than ever before, and so they require to be machined on five-axis equipment. Standardized tooling saves money and lead time for manufacturers. The trend is toward monolithic structures in aerospace design.. In earlier time, multiple sheet-metal components that were manufactured and then fastened together mechanically, which demanded a lot of additional assembly tooling and assembly labor. When other options are not allowed based on the geometry, the option left is full five axis. And the only industry where we've seen that happen at the moment is in the aerospace industry, like with blisk work, which is a combination of blade and disk. Five-axis configurations vary widely depending on the application, but the most common one is with both rotary axes are on the spindle. 

Programming complexity, aside from high cost, has posed the biggest barriers to widespread adoption of five-axis machinery. Five-axis machines continue to get faster and more accurate, so it's a technology that's emerging. It has its applications, but it is certainly not a mature, fully functional technology yet. CAM systems are still very weak. The learning curve for a CAD/CAM operator to become very good with five-axis is a challenge for small shops. Very few CAM systems can give you good data for full five-axis machining. 

Die/mold can take advantage of three-axis or 3+2. Among the European builders, there's a huge push in the five-axis machining centers for die/mold. Benefits to the five-axis approach, in terms of being able to hit multiple sides of the parts and being able to shorten the tool length on side walls, are considerable. CAM software and the sheer cost of five-axis machine tools are now less of an issue than in recent years In Europe, manufacturers readily accepted five-axis machining as a way to help compete with lower-cost labor centers in Asia and also in Eastern Europe. Because labor's so cheap in other markets, companies that want to remain competitive have to start machining smarter, which doesn't mean just machining faster or working longer hours. It means looking really closely at your current processes, focusing on your application, and investing in new technology, training, correct tooling, and a host of other factors to cut down lead times, so we can remain competitive. However, these machines aren't cheap. It's all right if you're a large manufacturer, but for a tooling company that is thinking of investing in this technology, it's a big money. For smaller tool-and-die shops, five-axis equipment ranging from $100,000 to $1 million is a major investment, but over the last few years these machines are more affordable for these smaller shops. 

Smaller shops are now seeing advantages to using five-axis and 3+2 technology. In the tool-and-die industry, 90% of the jobs can be machined extremely efficiently using 3+2 technology,  because it provides greater flexibility to cut the part, reduce tool length, improve surface finish, and one can still employ high-speed, high-efficiency machining techniques.
The progression has gone from three to 3+2-axis machining, where tool length can be shortened and machine can be run at high speeds as well. With simultaneous five-axis, all axes move at the same time 
Programming for simultaneous five-axis machining is complex Programming for five-axis requires much more consideration than for 3+2 machining. Part geometry, workpiece orientation, and entry and exit conditions are extremely important. Good collision detection is absolutely essential. One must be surely know what's happening and that the head of the machine isn't colliding with the part, clamps, or fixturing. <b>Many CAM software packages claim provision for 'gouge-free' toolpaths which are verified against the tool and the holder but not for the machine itself, which is essential for five-axis programming.
</b>
High-speed machining also plays a key role in manufacturers deploying five-axis systems to speed up their manufacturing processes. To apply five-axis machining techniques effectively, users need to find the proper solutions for their particular application. Users should seek out credible experts in five-axis machining. It can be quite confusing to new users entering this field, which can lead to discouragement and a loss of return on the investment. Speed, accuracy, and flexibility combined with manufacturing knowledge and experience can help users find the right tools for their needs. With five-axis machines, in the past the limiting factor was the speed of the rotary tables, but today's five-axis machines possess faster rotary tables.
However, five-axis machining is a smaller market.<b> Some manufacturers have sold well into high-production machining applications, particularly into engine manufacturing, </b>where five-axis equipment helps reduce setups. By reducing setups, it cuts down on work in process. The machines are doing well with jet engine components, prismatic parts, and engine components in automotive. Fast, single setups often make five-axis machining more efficient than three-axis equipment. Customers can mill, drill, tap, and saw parts to length in one setup, eliminating the need for any other machine or material handling system 

<b>Five axis machining provides the concept of one machine factory. Though the investment is high, but there is always a need of special complex parts manufacturing and that ensuring the best quality. Five axis machines are the answer.  

</b>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000542.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improvement and Innovation</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000537.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000537.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com:90/archives/uncategorized/000537.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Direct labor cost in the US is about $30/hr and in China it's $2/hr. But despite this much-publicized difference, this can't be a deterrent. This is what Jimmy Williams, director of development, Alcoa Technical center (Pittsburgh) feels and   dismisses those figures. According to him, the problem with manufacturing in USA is not worker wages, but the lack of innovation. US manufacturing needs to take advantage of the many manufacturing technologies now under development.
A four-step progression is followed by most products: 

1.	<b>Ferment</b> (growing interest in an idea), 

2.	<b>Dominant design</b> (several try to develop the idea and one becomes the leading concept), 

3.	<b>Incremental innovation</b> (the leading concept is improved), and 

4.	<b>Maturity</b> (the accepted design begins to lose dominance). 

Williams noted a parallel to this idea in the development of the airplane. First there was an early interest in flight, then the Wright brothers had a successful design. This was followed by the airplane's evolution from wood to aluminum, then composites as the key structural material.

"When any given technology is improving at a decreasing rate, it's likely a new technology will emerge to supplant it." Therefore the key to success is to get into the market with a new idea at the time of transition when it's possible to supply something that no one else is offering.

But, technology is not always the major issue. "Managing the change in customer preference is often the hardest task."

Sometimes <b>a major obstacle to innovation is he calls "the competency trap." </b>It's when a company has a core competency that has been the key to its success in the past. Managers are, therefore, reluctant to take the risk of pushing into new technologies.

A second stumbling block is the reluctance to take full advantage of new technology. He cites the current push for HSM (High Speed Machining) where, too often, a company will concentrate on a specific problem and ignore the larger opportunities. For example, HSM not only leads to faster production, but can often mean lighter parts, fewer tools needed, the chance to make modules rather than multipart assemblies, plus the many positive changes in machine tool and cutting tool design.
To take advantage of developing technologies Williams suggests:
"	Watch for signals of a changing technology. 
"	Both component and total system changes offer the opportunity for gain. 
"	Don't rely on tradition. You can't count on a company's established channels for gaging a market because they were not designed for the new technology. 
"	Be ready to manage change. Timing is everything. 

The history of human kind is the history of the improvements and innovations made by it as a continuous process. The nation that was good in it has done well. When it got choked because of any internal and external reasons, it became difficult to survive what to say to grow. <b>We in India must remember this mantra of improve and innovate in every walk of life to grow in face of the competition.
</b>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Direct labor cost in the US is about $30/hr and in China it's $2/hr. But despite this much-publicized difference, this can't be a deterrent. This is what Jimmy Williams, director of development, Alcoa Technical center (Pittsburgh) feels and   dismisses those figures. According to him, the problem with manufacturing in USA is not worker wages, but the lack of innovation. US manufacturing needs to take advantage of the many manufacturing technologies now under development.
A four-step progression is followed by most products: 

1.	<b>Ferment</b> (growing interest in an idea), 

2.	<b>Dominant design</b> (several try to develop the idea and one becomes the leading concept), 

3.	<b>Incremental innovation</b> (the leading concept is improved), and 

4.	<b>Maturity</b> (the accepted design begins to lose dominance). 

Williams noted a parallel to this idea in the development of the airplane. First there was an early interest in flight, then the Wright brothers had a successful design. This was followed by the airplane's evolution from wood to aluminum, then composites as the key structural material.

"When any given technology is improving at a decreasing rate, it's likely a new technology will emerge to supplant it." Therefore the key to success is to get into the market with a new idea at the time of transition when it's possible to supply something that no one else is offering.

But, technology is not always the major issue. "Managing the change in customer preference is often the hardest task."

Sometimes <b>a major obstacle to innovation is he calls "the competency trap." </b>It's when a company has a core competency that has been the key to its success in the past. Managers are, therefore, reluctant to take the risk of pushing into new technologies.

A second stumbling block is the reluctance to take full advantage of new technology. He cites the current push for HSM (High Speed Machining) where, too often, a company will concentrate on a specific problem and ignore the larger opportunities. For example, HSM not only leads to faster production, but can often mean lighter parts, fewer tools needed, the chance to make modules rather than multipart assemblies, plus the many positive changes in machine tool and cutting tool design.
To take advantage of developing technologies Williams suggests:
"	Watch for signals of a changing technology. 
"	Both component and total system changes offer the opportunity for gain. 
"	Don't rely on tradition. You can't count on a company's established channels for gaging a market because they were not designed for the new technology. 
"	Be ready to manage change. Timing is everything. 

The history of human kind is the history of the improvements and innovations made by it as a continuous process. The nation that was good in it has done well. When it got choked because of any internal and external reasons, it became difficult to survive what to say to grow. <b>We in India must remember this mantra of improve and innovate in every walk of life to grow in face of the competition.
</b>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000537.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flexible and then Agile</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000527.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000527.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com:90/archives/uncategorized/000527.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Flexible manufacturing</b>
Flexibility requirements have almost made the application of traditional inline transfer lines obsolete. Incorporation of NC-controlled feed units, multi-axis NC-units, swiveling drilling heads, sometimes head changers, flexible design of work transfer pallets provides a lot of flexibility in present generation of transfer line to be called rightly as flexible transfer. The idea of using even high speed machining center modules for flexible transfer line in the auto industry has become quite popular. Transfer system may be similar to traditional transfer lines, power and free conveyor, or conventional electromechanical one such as lift and carry system used in high production line. For lesser flexibility required by high production line, a trend is to strip machine tools of redundant features to trim prices by 30 to 50 %. Some simply reduce the number of control axes, cheaper controllers, and/or tool magazine's capacity. Designers throughout the machine tool industry are working hard to make these high-tech machines cost competitive with conventional machines. Systems used for high production machining may be:
"Sequential machining on three-axis modular production-type machining centers with limited tool-changer capacity (say, 6 to 24), and dedicated hydraulic fixtures. Units can also be installed as wing bases on a dial index machine. In another setup, units can be positioned close together to form a transfer machine.  Appropriate machines - heavier machining centers for milling operations; lighter and high speed ones for drilling, and reaming; a tapping center for fast tapping; a very precision unit for close tolerance boring; may constitute the machining line. The part moves ahead in sequence passing through all the machining stations. 
" Asequential machining features identical CNC machining centers with a larger tool-changer capacity, each of which can do all machining operations for each part assigned to the cell, including milling, drilling, boring, counter-boring, and tapping. The system takes care of a machine-breakdown easily. The system may start with minimum number of machines, and grows with addition of machines as the production increases. The part moves as programmed to different work-stations depending on real time situation.

<b>Agile manufacturing</b>
A switchover from flexible manufacturing to agile manufacturing system is becoming a necessity. It provides the unlimited scope of changeover over the limited scope of change in flexible manufacturing. Instead of building something that anticipates a defined range of requirements based on ten or twelve contingencies in flexible manufacturing, the emphasis by an agile system is to build something that can be deconstructed and reconstructed as needed. Present trend prefers the use of cost-effective single spindle machining centers that are configurable as both transfer machine modules and standalone machines, capable of high force, high speed machining, and optimized for a range of materials from aluminum to cast iron.

<b>All the machine tools for medium to high production are being designed with built-in agility as a necessary feature. For example, the totally self-contained electrical and power units are designed with a 'single plug' system. Even a precision machine today is moved with a forklift truck, and then with a few connections and leveling, it gets ready for production. Agility does not compromise stability. </b>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Flexible manufacturing</b>
Flexibility requirements have almost made the application of traditional inline transfer lines obsolete. Incorporation of NC-controlled feed units, multi-axis NC-units, swiveling drilling heads, sometimes head changers, flexible design of work transfer pallets provides a lot of flexibility in present generation of transfer line to be called rightly as flexible transfer. The idea of using even high speed machining center modules for flexible transfer line in the auto industry has become quite popular. Transfer system may be similar to traditional transfer lines, power and free conveyor, or conventional electromechanical one such as lift and carry system used in high production line. For lesser flexibility required by high production line, a trend is to strip machine tools of redundant features to trim prices by 30 to 50 %. Some simply reduce the number of control axes, cheaper controllers, and/or tool magazine's capacity. Designers throughout the machine tool industry are working hard to make these high-tech machines cost competitive with conventional machines. Systems used for high production machining may be:
"Sequential machining on three-axis modular production-type machining centers with limited tool-changer capacity (say, 6 to 24), and dedicated hydraulic fixtures. Units can also be installed as wing bases on a dial index machine. In another setup, units can be positioned close together to form a transfer machine.  Appropriate machines - heavier machining centers for milling operations; lighter and high speed ones for drilling, and reaming; a tapping center for fast tapping; a very precision unit for close tolerance boring; may constitute the machining line. The part moves ahead in sequence passing through all the machining stations. 
" Asequential machining features identical CNC machining centers with a larger tool-changer capacity, each of which can do all machining operations for each part assigned to the cell, including milling, drilling, boring, counter-boring, and tapping. The system takes care of a machine-breakdown easily. The system may start with minimum number of machines, and grows with addition of machines as the production increases. The part moves as programmed to different work-stations depending on real time situation.

<b>Agile manufacturing</b>
A switchover from flexible manufacturing to agile manufacturing system is becoming a necessity. It provides the unlimited scope of changeover over the limited scope of change in flexible manufacturing. Instead of building something that anticipates a defined range of requirements based on ten or twelve contingencies in flexible manufacturing, the emphasis by an agile system is to build something that can be deconstructed and reconstructed as needed. Present trend prefers the use of cost-effective single spindle machining centers that are configurable as both transfer machine modules and standalone machines, capable of high force, high speed machining, and optimized for a range of materials from aluminum to cast iron.

<b>All the machine tools for medium to high production are being designed with built-in agility as a necessary feature. For example, the totally self-contained electrical and power units are designed with a 'single plug' system. Even a precision machine today is moved with a forklift truck, and then with a few connections and leveling, it gets ready for production. Agility does not compromise stability. </b>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000527.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Production Machining Centres</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000521.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000521.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com:90/archives/uncategorized/000521.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Machining centers are entering the high production facilities of automotive plant that were earlier the domain of only dedicated transfer machines with special purpose unit heads that perform total machining on a part in sequence with automated work handling in between. The traditional transfer lines are highly expensive. In case of failure in market prediction regarding volume, the investment may be disastrous for a company, as the transfer lines demand a minimum volume of production for a number of years for getting the required return on investment that is made much before even the first part is produced. Even in day-to-day operation, transfer line requires a lot of blocked work-in-process inventory. Additionally, any minor breakdown in system stops the assembly and holds the assembly. Traditional transfer line is economical only with a production of 150,000 to 200,000 parts per year and above. Present trends of changing customer demands, competition, fast innovations requiring changes in product and in turn, in parts do not justify the use of dedicated equipment or lines. High-speed machining centers have brought CNC flexibility with transfer line level of speed at much lower investment on equipment and engineering. In an ideal case, the production may be started with just one machining center to carry out all operation and then to buy more machines as production requirements increase. 

Present trend is to start with a manufacturing cell- a group of minimum number of the high speed machining centers that complete machining of all features. Breakdown of one of the machining centers does not affect the assembly significantly. The cell may include automatic work handling or the work handling may get added later with higher level of production. Similarly, the hydraulic or vacuum type fixtures may replace standard manual tombstone type fixtures used for initial production. As the production picks up, the cell can be expanded or multiplied. At a level of say, 200000 per annum, dedicated machining line may take over, if found economical by that time. At that stage, the cell/s can either jack up the productivity of the dedicated line, if required or switch over to some other part. If the machining centers in the cell have been of the modular design, it can become part of the transfer line. Auto manufacturers are today learning to break a production requirement of even 400,000parts/year requiring expensive and inflexible transfer lines into four cells of 100,000parts/year each. With high speed machining centers, even machining processes such as surface grinding and honing are being integrated on the same machine.  

In a Ford plant, a line with high speed machining centers provides the same output as a flexible transfer line at about two-thirds of the total investment. Ford engineers reduced floor-to-floor production time for precision machining of clutch housings by 60%. The substantial shorter changeover times give a decided advantage to Ford when it comes to model change. Most of these machines are modular and easy to move in and out to and from their locations as and when required. Analysis of the multi-spindle machines used in the conventional lines proves that 85% of machines have a head with 10 or fewer spindles and 96% of hole-diameters are 10 mm or less. 

A machine tool manufacturer with experience in automobile industry believes optimal production for high speed machining centers is about 1200-1500 cylinder heads and about 1500-1800 gearbox housing per day in two shifts. In specific applications, many methods are being used to cut down the non-cutting time in production setup to improve upon the cycle time to increase production. One of the methods may be the combination tools engineered for specific features or special tool such as thriller that can perform in a single operation what usually calls for a drill, chamfering tool, and tap or thread mill. While reducing the number of tools, it eliminates tool change between operations together with improved quality in many cases. Thriller tools are extensively used in threading operations on aluminum and cast iron engine and transmission parts.

<b>Machining centres have brought flexibility in manufacturing of mechanical parts at all volumes. And the machine tools are now agile enough and moving towards virtual machining systems.

</b>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Machining centers are entering the high production facilities of automotive plant that were earlier the domain of only dedicated transfer machines with special purpose unit heads that perform total machining on a part in sequence with automated work handling in between. The traditional transfer lines are highly expensive. In case of failure in market prediction regarding volume, the investment may be disastrous for a company, as the transfer lines demand a minimum volume of production for a number of years for getting the required return on investment that is made much before even the first part is produced. Even in day-to-day operation, transfer line requires a lot of blocked work-in-process inventory. Additionally, any minor breakdown in system stops the assembly and holds the assembly. Traditional transfer line is economical only with a production of 150,000 to 200,000 parts per year and above. Present trends of changing customer demands, competition, fast innovations requiring changes in product and in turn, in parts do not justify the use of dedicated equipment or lines. High-speed machining centers have brought CNC flexibility with transfer line level of speed at much lower investment on equipment and engineering. In an ideal case, the production may be started with just one machining center to carry out all operation and then to buy more machines as production requirements increase. 

Present trend is to start with a manufacturing cell- a group of minimum number of the high speed machining centers that complete machining of all features. Breakdown of one of the machining centers does not affect the assembly significantly. The cell may include automatic work handling or the work handling may get added later with higher level of production. Similarly, the hydraulic or vacuum type fixtures may replace standard manual tombstone type fixtures used for initial production. As the production picks up, the cell can be expanded or multiplied. At a level of say, 200000 per annum, dedicated machining line may take over, if found economical by that time. At that stage, the cell/s can either jack up the productivity of the dedicated line, if required or switch over to some other part. If the machining centers in the cell have been of the modular design, it can become part of the transfer line. Auto manufacturers are today learning to break a production requirement of even 400,000parts/year requiring expensive and inflexible transfer lines into four cells of 100,000parts/year each. With high speed machining centers, even machining processes such as surface grinding and honing are being integrated on the same machine.  

In a Ford plant, a line with high speed machining centers provides the same output as a flexible transfer line at about two-thirds of the total investment. Ford engineers reduced floor-to-floor production time for precision machining of clutch housings by 60%. The substantial shorter changeover times give a decided advantage to Ford when it comes to model change. Most of these machines are modular and easy to move in and out to and from their locations as and when required. Analysis of the multi-spindle machines used in the conventional lines proves that 85% of machines have a head with 10 or fewer spindles and 96% of hole-diameters are 10 mm or less. 

A machine tool manufacturer with experience in automobile industry believes optimal production for high speed machining centers is about 1200-1500 cylinder heads and about 1500-1800 gearbox housing per day in two shifts. In specific applications, many methods are being used to cut down the non-cutting time in production setup to improve upon the cycle time to increase production. One of the methods may be the combination tools engineered for specific features or special tool such as thriller that can perform in a single operation what usually calls for a drill, chamfering tool, and tap or thread mill. While reducing the number of tools, it eliminates tool change between operations together with improved quality in many cases. Thriller tools are extensively used in threading operations on aluminum and cast iron engine and transmission parts.

<b>Machining centres have brought flexibility in manufacturing of mechanical parts at all volumes. And the machine tools are now agile enough and moving towards virtual machining systems.

</b>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000521.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trends in Cutting Tools&#8217; Development</title>
		<link>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000518.php</link>
		<comments>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000518.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Indra</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Machining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drishtikona.com:90/archives/uncategorized/000518.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reasons behind cutting tool developments are better manufacturing productivity, improved accuracy, and quality. One of the main trends influencing cutting tool design is developing cutting tools for small-part manufacturing, such as those for the medical industry, which is seeing a phenomenal growth annually.
Another important thrust is for the tools that can meet multitasking requirements.. The industry needs longer, yet rigid tools that can reach into limited spaces.
<b>New Materials</b>
There is an increased emphasis on the uses of titanium and titanium alloys.
The auto industry is going for more aluminum-silicon alloys as well as some magnesium, 
The industry is also showing increasing interest in compacted graphite iron [CGI]- a variant of ductile iron. Though the tools that work well on ductile iron can, in general, do the job on CGI as well, but  the absolute tool life is likely to be less when cutting CGI because of its abrasiveness and higher yield strength. Flank wear resistance is particularly important with this metal.
Among the trends:
"	The nickel-based alloys are becoming more difficult to machine. 
"	Whisker ceramics and improved Sialons continue to be used. 
"	Sialons have extended the property range and toughness. 
"	Titanium/aluminum (TiAl) coatings have improved for cutting stainless, regular steels, and cast irons. This is because PVD technology has improved coating adhesion. 
TiAlN coatings have better adhesion, and for cutting aluminum give better chemical stability and they dissolve more slowly in ferrous materials, and have higher hardness levels. As a result, tool life is longer and cutting speeds are higher.

<b>Coatings</b> have made major improvements. Majority of tools are coated. For the greatest portion PVD is used. At the same time there has been a surprisingly rapid development of CVD technology, chiefly improvements in adhesion to substrates and between layers. There have also been improvements in coating smoothness and thickness. Turning-tool coatings are now more than 20 &micro;m and milling tools are up to 7&micro;m.
There is now <b>greater use of substrates with cobalt content less than 6%</b>. They are used in high-volume ferrous machining applications. This reflects the trend in machining to higher speeds, smaller DOC, and fewer interrupted cuts.

There is a clear trend away <b>from HSS to cemented carbide in end mills</b> because new machining centers with higher speeds are stiffer and need more wear resistant tools. Milling is an area where big improvements in indexable end mills have been made. A new system called Mill 1- offers better surface finish, while requiring less power and lower cutting forces. The perpendicularity is now close to a true 90&ordm;, and it has good ramping capabilities.

Another innovation is <b>the insert screw is mounted at an angle, instead of the traditional perpendicular mount</b>. This has two advantages. It pulls the insert into the holder more tightly and has more screw threads engaging the holder. As a result cutting speeds can be higher.

In the last two years, there has been a lot of growth in applications of lightweight nonferrous materials as well as hardened steel and other difficult-to-machine ferrous materials. As a result, the <b>market has significantly increased for custom-engineered round tools with brazed cutting edges of PCD or PCBN for milling, drilling, and reaming operations.</b> Custom round tools with fixed cutting edges are intended for machining parts with small-diameter holes of approximately 0.25" [13 - mm] diameter where the restricted space is a problem for insert-type cutting tools. They also apply for parts with relatively tight tolerances in the range of 3 - 5 &micro;in. [0.002 &micro;m] because of the possibility of cutting-edge movement with inserted-type cutting tools.
Ways are being found to cut deliveries of round tools by half or more by automating the process. Using the new software, standard delivery for high-precision custom round tools is 10 weeks, and in some cases as little as four weeks.

Our industry moves ahead relatively slowly, with cutting tool development usually ahead of machine tool performance. However, <b>currently 70,000 rpm is achievable on the machine and spindle end, but at this time the inserts won't hold up.</b> Aerospace is where we most often see new alloys being used, then it falls on the cutting tool makers to develop products that will work Recently there have been some advances in diamond tooling.
Iinsert grades for turning steels and stainless steels are being designed for <b>dry machining through a combination of wear resistance and edge toughness</b>. Getting rid of coolant can extend tool life. New inserts offer reliability and improved surface finishes in medium-duty turning of steels because its toughness resists chipping. The inserts combine superior core toughness, high wear resistance and sophisticated chipbreaker geometries, and  are especially designed to withstand heavy roughing, interrupted cuts, high-feed applications and processes on materials with high piece-to-piece or batch-to-batch variability.

A new line of indexable insert drills have a combination of features that allow drilling with much faster speeds and feeds even on applications with long overhangs, workpieces with poor fixturing, and thin-walled parts. The entire drilling line, which covers a range of 0.594 - 2.375" [6 - 60-mm] diam and drilling depth capabilities from 2XD to 5XD, uses square inserts with 90&ordm; corners. The drill body resists deflection and evacuates chips. Plus, the drills have a non-stick coating that further enhances performance and drill life.

Tools are being developed to meet the industry's requirement of lean manufacturing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The reasons behind cutting tool developments are better manufacturing productivity, improved accuracy, and quality. One of the main trends influencing cutting tool design is developing cutting tools for small-part manufacturing, such as those for the medical industry, which is seeing a phenomenal growth annually.
Another important thrust is for the tools that can meet multitasking requirements.. The industry needs longer, yet rigid tools that can reach into limited spaces.
<b>New Materials</b>
There is an increased emphasis on the uses of titanium and titanium alloys.
The auto industry is going for more aluminum-silicon alloys as well as some magnesium, 
The industry is also showing increasing interest in compacted graphite iron [CGI]- a variant of ductile iron. Though the tools that work well on ductile iron can, in general, do the job on CGI as well, but  the absolute tool life is likely to be less when cutting CGI because of its abrasiveness and higher yield strength. Flank wear resistance is particularly important with this metal.
Among the trends:
"	The nickel-based alloys are becoming more difficult to machine. 
"	Whisker ceramics and improved Sialons continue to be used. 
"	Sialons have extended the property range and toughness. 
"	Titanium/aluminum (TiAl) coatings have improved for cutting stainless, regular steels, and cast irons. This is because PVD technology has improved coating adhesion. 
TiAlN coatings have better adhesion, and for cutting aluminum give better chemical stability and they dissolve more slowly in ferrous materials, and have higher hardness levels. As a result, tool life is longer and cutting speeds are higher.

<b>Coatings</b> have made major improvements. Majority of tools are coated. For the greatest portion PVD is used. At the same time there has been a surprisingly rapid development of CVD technology, chiefly improvements in adhesion to substrates and between layers. There have also been improvements in coating smoothness and thickness. Turning-tool coatings are now more than 20 &micro;m and milling tools are up to 7&micro;m.
There is now <b>greater use of substrates with cobalt content less than 6%</b>. They are used in high-volume ferrous machining applications. This reflects the trend in machining to higher speeds, smaller DOC, and fewer interrupted cuts.

There is a clear trend away <b>from HSS to cemented carbide in end mills</b> because new machining centers with higher speeds are stiffer and need more wear resistant tools. Milling is an area where big improvements in indexable end mills have been made. A new system called Mill 1- offers better surface finish, while requiring less power and lower cutting forces. The perpendicularity is now close to a true 90&ordm;, and it has good ramping capabilities.

Another innovation is <b>the insert screw is mounted at an angle, instead of the traditional perpendicular mount</b>. This has two advantages. It pulls the insert into the holder more tightly and has more screw threads engaging the holder. As a result cutting speeds can be higher.

In the last two years, there has been a lot of growth in applications of lightweight nonferrous materials as well as hardened steel and other difficult-to-machine ferrous materials. As a result, the <b>market has significantly increased for custom-engineered round tools with brazed cutting edges of PCD or PCBN for milling, drilling, and reaming operations.</b> Custom round tools with fixed cutting edges are intended for machining parts with small-diameter holes of approximately 0.25" [13 - mm] diameter where the restricted space is a problem for insert-type cutting tools. They also apply for parts with relatively tight tolerances in the range of 3 - 5 &micro;in. [0.002 &micro;m] because of the possibility of cutting-edge movement with inserted-type cutting tools.
Ways are being found to cut deliveries of round tools by half or more by automating the process. Using the new software, standard delivery for high-precision custom round tools is 10 weeks, and in some cases as little as four weeks.

Our industry moves ahead relatively slowly, with cutting tool development usually ahead of machine tool performance. However, <b>currently 70,000 rpm is achievable on the machine and spindle end, but at this time the inserts won't hold up.</b> Aerospace is where we most often see new alloys being used, then it falls on the cutting tool makers to develop products that will work Recently there have been some advances in diamond tooling.
Iinsert grades for turning steels and stainless steels are being designed for <b>dry machining through a combination of wear resistance and edge toughness</b>. Getting rid of coolant can extend tool life. New inserts offer reliability and improved surface finishes in medium-duty turning of steels because its toughness resists chipping. The inserts combine superior core toughness, high wear resistance and sophisticated chipbreaker geometries, and  are especially designed to withstand heavy roughing, interrupted cuts, high-feed applications and processes on materials with high piece-to-piece or batch-to-batch variability.

A new line of indexable insert drills have a combination of features that allow drilling with much faster speeds and feeds even on applications with long overhangs, workpieces with poor fixturing, and thin-walled parts. The entire drilling line, which covers a range of 0.594 - 2.375" [6 - 60-mm] diam and drilling depth capabilities from 2XD to 5XD, uses square inserts with 90&ordm; corners. The drill body resists deflection and evacuates chips. Plus, the drills have a non-stick coating that further enhances performance and drill life.

Tools are being developed to meet the industry's requirement of lean manufacturing.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drishtikona.com/archives/machining/000518.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

