Hemu ‘Vikramaditya’- Unsung Hero of Indian History

Posted : July 23, 2006 at 6:53 am [IST]

If I ask many well-educated Indians, “Who was Hemu?” I am sure to get a blank look on their faces. Unfortunately, he has not been the darling of the historians too. Was it because he had a lowly parentage or because he didn’t belong to one of the higher castes? Was it because of his disadvantages of a wretchedly puny physique to rise from being a saltpeter pedlar in a provincial bazzar to chief minister to one of the principal Sur claimants, after Sher Shah Suri? YK Singh, my neighbour and advocate friend vested last evening, and as usual, knowing my interest in Indian history, asked me about Hemu and expressed his amazement that even traders backed governments of India never tried to honour this great son of India.

Shershah’s short but illustrious reign was over because of his sudden demise in Kalinjhar. On January 24, 1556 Mughal ruler Humayun slipped while climbing down the steps of his library and fell to his death. On February 14, 1556, in a garden at Kalanaur, Akbar was enthroned as emperor. He was in teens at that time. The other rivals for the throne of Delhi were the three Afghan princes of Sher Shah. However the main threat to Akbar’s future came not from the Afghan princes but from a Hindu, Hemu. I wished to find out what John Keay in his ‘India-A History’ writes about Hemu.

“Yet more surprisingly for one who could not even ride a horse, he had acquired a reputation for inspired generalship. Twenty-two consecutive battles is Hemu said to have won against assorted adversaries. To this tally, he added a twenty-third when, soon after Humayun’s death, he stormed Delhi and put its Mughal garrison to flight. Not surprisingly even his mainly Afgan, and so Muslim, troops regarded their ‘Shah h Hemu’ as an inspirational commander.” After the capture of Delhi, Hemu set up himself as an independent ruler under the Hindu title of ‘Raja Vikramaditya’. How many of us know that Hemu, the ruler of Delhi?

At Panipat, on November 1556 Hemu faced Bayaram Khan, Akbar’s guardian. According to Abu’l-Fazal, the enemy had assembled a corps of fifteen hundred of the largest and most athletic beasts ever seen-elephants. For once victory looked to be going the way of the elephants. Hemu, to whose abilities even Abu’l Fazal bears grudging testimony, commanded operations from a gigantic beast called ‘Hawai’ (’Windy’, or possibly ‘Rocket’). ‘he made powerful onsets and performed many valarious acts.’ Indeed the Mughals were wavering when ’suddenly an arrow from the bended bow of divine wrath reached Hemu’s eye and, piercing the socket, came out at the back of his head.’ Seeing Hemu collapse into his howdah, his troops lost heart. It was now the sublime army, swords flashing and epithets flying, which closed for the kill. Hawai was captured; Hemu extracted from his howdah and dragged before the young victor (Akbar), was quickly beheaded. Mughals were third time lucky.

And a great hero vanished.

As per one another account,

“Shah Quli Khan captured the Hawai elephant with its prize occupant, and took it directly to Akbar. Hemu was brought unconscious before Akbar and Bairam. Bairam pleaded Akbar to perform the holy duty of slaying the infidel and earn the Islamic holy title of ‘Ghazi’. Among much self-congratulation AKBAR THEN SEVERED THE HEAD OF UNCONSCIOUS HEMU WITH HIS SABER (2,3,4). Some historians claim that Akbar did not kill Hemu himself, but just touched the infidel’s head with his sword and his associates finished the gory ‘holy’ work. However the latter version seems inconsistent with the events that followed. After the battle Hemu’s head was sent to Kabul as a sign of victory to the ladies of Humayun’s harem, and Hemu’s torso was sent to Delhi for exposure on a gibbet.”

One does not wonder if the court historians of Mughals didn’t write much about Hemu. But why have our historians even after independence not done justice by giving Hemu his right place? Is it because we wish to keep our secular image in tact. Don’t the people of India expect a well-done research about Hemu (an aam aadami) who could become the emperor of India just by his unique leadership qualities?

- Indra

Viewed: 2696 times

3 Comments »

Hemu Belonged to Sasaram of Bihar and a Rouniyar Vaish

In the absence of any historical disclosure one has to go thorough the history of Sher Shah /Adil Shah (of Suri Dynasty) the Ruler of Sasaram to know who Vikramaditya Hemu was ???.

Sury Dynasty

Son of a Petty Afgan Jagirdar of Sasaram, Sher Shah was born in Punjab.He escaped from the ill treatment of his step mother. He entered the services of the Afgan Governor of Jaunpur Later on, Sher Shah took up the service under the governor of Bengal and captured whole of Bengal by 1530. Later he became the ruler of Bihar(??). He defeated Humayun in the battle of Chausa and Kanauj in AD 1540. Sher Shah also conquered Malwa in 1542 and Raisin in 1543 and died in 1545. After his death his son Jalal ruled under the title of Islam Shah till 1553. Firuz ( Son of Jalal/ Islam Shah) was put to death by Mubariz Khan who was the nephew of Sher Shah and brother of Jalal’s own mother. Mubariz Khan took up the title of Mohd. Adil Shah. He was not a capable leader. His minister Hemu rose to importance and became Army Chief-cum-Prime Minister of Adil Shah, who occupied Bengal with his base at Chunar.

Birth Place & Caste of Vikramaditya Hemu ??

Some learned historians/writters claim that Hemu was born at Machheri Village of Alwar in 1501 and spent his youth in Reewari ( Haryana) . His father , a Brahmin, was a purohit. He was unable to earn sufficient income to feed his family mainly due to persecution of Hindu religious ceremonies by mugals. Therefore he started trading in food/salt and Hemu became saltpeter on street. ( wikipedia,the free encyclopaedia/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewari)

(These learned historians/writters fail to establish any reliable connections/ relations between Adil Shah,the ruler of Sasaram & Hemu with Alwar or Rewari . It is a matter of common sense that only closed and trusted friends since childhood would be appointed as Prime Minister cum Military chief of any Ruler especially Mugal ones. Since Adil Shah was born & bought up in Sasaram so Hemu must have belonged to Sasaram or near about area . However Hemu’s wife might have got refuge/shelter in Reewari after an escape from Delhi in 1556.As far as his caste is concerned normally it is traditionally perceived that those engaged in business/trading about six centuries ago were from Bania/Vanik or vaishya and not from Brahmin community. Thus the Rauniyar’s century old claim that Hemu was their legend, seems to be not out of contention.However a detailed investigation/research is required .

Rauniyar/Rouniyar : Many Rauniyar will agree with our view that our ancestors were small traders and most of them might have expressed their solidarity as warrior and joined hands with their hero Hemu belonging to their own caste. Since Hemu lost the battle and his wife escaped from Delhi with her trusted hindu solders to a unknown destination, our ancestors started being called / termed as Raun ( battle) har ( looser). The dialect was corrupted/distorted in next few centuries to be termed as Rauniyar.

( Ref:- Hemu ‘Vikramaditya’-Unsung Hero of Indian History, JohnKeay ‘India- A History’)

(Ref :- The new Cambridge history of India, the mughal emperors by John F Richards page no 13)
Ref;-http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/IndiaArchaeology/message/1058

GLORIOUS CONTRIBUTION BY ‘BACKWARD CLASSES’ TO HINDUISM & INDIA,
By N. Nirakar
Hemu - Dhansar (weighman in the market), Ruler of Delhi for 1 month. Fought with Akbar and was killed in the 2nd battle of Panipat (Nov.5, 1556)

Posted by: Subodh Gupta at January 12, 2009 @ 7:16 pm

Rauniyar is the son of God Bishnu and Maa Laxmi. Bishnu (Trader/Palanhar) with killing rakshas in Rudra Rupa called Rauniyar means Raun ka Yar or Lover of War. We are descended of God Bishnu. GUPTA empire was Rauniyar, Maurya empire was Rauniyar, Hemu was Rauniyar. There are so many series of Rauniyar Heroes.

Posted by: Ranvijay Rauniyar at September 19, 2011 @ 1:43 am

your article on rauniyar and hemu seems quite authentic.
Thanks a lot

ritesh kumar

Posted by: Ritesh Kumar at December 1, 2011 @ 10:08 pm

Leave a Comment